Skip to main content

Instead of fighting City Hall, you may just want to move to a different City . .


Council Member Melissa Mark-Viverito holds 2,500 handwritten letters to Mayor Bloomberg, urging him to complete the First and Second Avenue bike lanes. Behind her are Sen. José Serrano and Assm. Brian Kavanagh. Photo: Noah Kazis.
from www.streeetblog.org


While I was studying engineering at the University of Michigan in the late 80's, I was continually surrounded by the active protests and political movements of students eager to change the world.  The diverse student body of U of M was a hotbed of cultural expressions brought about the intoxicating need to "take on the MAN".  As a young engineer, I would sometimes take on the establishment at work and school with a bull-headed charge which often resulted in bruised relationships and a reputation for being a troublemaker.

Please don't get me wrong, I haven't become a sell-out.  I haven't abandoned the need to be a part of radical change, but I have learned a more subtle, lower-key method of affecting change while not drawing too much attention to myself or my goals.  I am not referring to abrupt political revolution like we have seen recently in the Middle-East, I am discussing cultural changes at work that improve the ability of an organization to manage in the future.  In order to be effective, it is necessary to quantify what needs to be changed, and to coordinate an effort to bring your organization around and aligned with that vision in a given time frame.  The real art of making change has more to do with influencing others to round about your cause, rather than duke it out all on your own.

A practical example would be to structure a skills training program to bring up junior members of the team up to speed in anticipation for an upcoming expansion.  If an ongoing project will need skilled employees in a 12-18 months, the time to start this process is now, not a year and a half from now.  This may sound like simple common sense, but all to often the skills inventory is ignored until the deficiency is causing commissioning problems.  Given the tasks that will be encountered, the needed skills must be identified before anything else is started.  If a half dozen positions are going to be necessary, it is best to identify at least twice the amount of potential candidates.    The skills of these candidates need to be inventoried and a program of training set-up to fill in the gaps.  The development of your team can be evaluated many times along the way to allow for adjustments.  When the time comes to "man-up" for the expansion, you will have a strong pool of candidates to select from.  Those who aren't selected are going to benefit from the development program, and will have opportunities to apply what they have learned in different situations.  Those who are selected will have the skill set needed for success.

Sometimes, the business culture you are in doesn't allow you to shape the future condition in your vision.  This is frustrating and can make life at work miserable. You see a need, but upper management thinks you are off-base.  You may see impending doom 6-12 months off, while your superiors are still looking at the sunny skies of today.  Before you go bull-head strong to change minds, you may want to ask yourself some very reasonable questions (Another managersandwich questions list):

1)  Do you have enough potential supporters in upper management to affect change?
2)  Do you have the energy level to push these points against the grain before it is too late?
3)  Have you been here before?  Were you successful the last time? If not, what are you thinking?
4)  Are you operating an environment where "causing trouble" is going to hinder your abilities to affect change in the future?

Don't take #4 too lightly.  When it comes down to it, you are at work to earn a living.  Don't cut yourself out of the tree unless you have a ladder to stand on.  If you find yourself having to do this more often as you rise in your organization, you may be in the wrong company.  Forget about sunk costs and commitments to the long term.  Slowly and surely you can be taking days and weeks off of your life with internalized frustration and contempt.  When you elevate yourself in your career, but find the ability to express yourself being limited, it is a sure sign to move on.  If you aren't a principal, owner, or founder, you may not have the influence necessary to affect change without support.  Rather than wasting precious energy, time, and your sanity, it may be in your best interest to find an organization more in line with your philosophy, or split off on your own.

Instead of fighting City Hall, find somewhere better to hang your hat. Find a place where there aren't so many oppressive rules.  Do a favor, and leave a fowarding address, so those who believe in you can still find you where you land.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strength of Manufacturing, Today and Tomorrow

During a recent staff meeting, I grabbed a can of soda from the mini-fridge in the conference room.  There was one lonely can of Vernors Ginger Ale amongst the plethora of cans of Pepsi, and Diet Pepsi.  Normally, I don't drink regular soda because of the sugar, but a spicy Vernors sure did sound good.  If you aren't familiar with Vernors, it's a long-time Detroit favorite.  A once regional product, it has become a nationwide staple.  Different from Canada Dry or Schwepps ginger ale, Vernors has a unique darker color and spiciness that makes it an acquired taste. The logo of Vernors has always been an old style wooden stave barrel with riveted wrought iron bands.  Even this particular can was dressed up like an old barrel.  While holding the can in my hand, my mind was flooded of thoughts and memories about my connection with Detroit, and my grandfather, great uncle, and great grandfather that were in the barrel and crate business.  The business later transformed, just

Movie Remakes. Where is the Imagination? Why was Papillon remade at all?

` It has been a while since I have posted, and for that I profusely apologize.  It's not that I haven't written, but I have ignored this blog too long. This particular post is a diversion from my normal managerial anecdotes, but I feel there is an important point regarding senseless remakes and reboots of films that were perfectly great to begin with. Please don't get me wrong; I think that advances in special effects and cinematography allow for a clearer representation of a director's vision.  However, I can think of only a few remakes that even come close to the original in quality, and perhaps "The Bounty" with Anthony Hopkins and a young Mel Gibson is one of them.  Unfortunately, remaking the 1973 "Papillon" that starred Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman is not one of them. Dustin Hoffman's Louis Dega McQueen as Charriere (Papillon) I remember watching the original with my brother over 40 years ago. Steve McQuee

Richard Winters: Integrity In Leadership

Maj. Richard Winters      While I was watching HBO's " Band of Brothers " mini-series, for the twenty-something th time, I recognized something poignant. Maj. Richard Winters , who serves as the central connecting character, continually demonstrates exceptional middle management virtues.  His leadership is exemplary, not just in a military sense, but for any organizational setting.  He led by example and was always willing to go first, where he sent others.  He knew how to balance compassion with expectations. When it was necessary to be stern and authoritative, he was. When it was necessary to show empathy, he did.  He learned to delegate, even though it was never easy.  He gained the respect of his peers and his subordinates through his actions, not by intimidation or cruelty. Damien Lewis as Richard Winter s      Richard Winters knew he wasn't perfect. He didn't demand perfection, he demanded ultimate accountability. In contrast to Herbert Sobel's b