Skip to main content

When 95% Success Can Still Lead to Failure

Last week, while finishing up a two-day maintenance outage at work, I was exhausted.  I was about to get myself ready to head home when I saw something in a co worker's office that caught my attention.  He had an 18" adjustable (often called Crescent) wrench on his bookcase that was missing the movable jaw and adjusting worm gear.  I picked it up and grinned.  My coworker said he was disappointed that he couldn't find economical replacement parts allowing the wrench to be repaired for less than buying new.

I stood there, looking at him, exhausted from 15 hours at work, with the wrench in my hand, and said "I feel just like this wrench, 95% here, but completely worthless."  It then dawned on me the significance of the joke so I asked him if I could keep the wrench.  He was glad to have one less piece of junk in his office so he said "Sure."

All weekend long I thought about the broken wrench and why only 5% of it missing made it useless, and how that compared to so several activities that I participate with at work including:  Safety, Quality, and Environmental Compliance.  Each of these activities truly demands 100% effort, since skating by 5% of the time can easily lead to injury/death, lost customers, and huge fines.  Throughout my 20 year career, I have noticed all three of these aspects of work increase in their impact on daily business, ten-fold.  This isn't saying that they were ignored, but rather the accumulative emphasis year-in and year-out has led to a cultural shift in the workplace.  Back in the 70's and 80's it was common for people to look the other way when it came to chemical spills, unsafe working conditions, and inconsistent quality.


 The competitiveness of the world economy made it all but impossible to be a manufacturer without control over your processes.  This was certainly the case in the US automotive industry during the late 1970's and early 1980's when Japanese automakers were delivering a more reliable product due to higher safety standards.  Bit by bit, quality systems were generated that led to a internationally accepted set of guidelines we refer to now as ISO or QS.

Safety compliance has come on strong during my twenty year career.  People used to say that it was impossible to prevent "all" accidents.  In a practical sense, maybe this is true, but admitting it is a sure-fire way to decrease your effort from 100% to a deadly 95%.  The incident pyramid on the left shows an example of the rough statistics of 300,000 unsafe work acts and how they can result in near misses, recordable injuries, lost workday cases, and eventually a fatality.  300,000 may seem like a huge number, but if you take a moment to reflect on all of the small tasks done between getting out of the shower in the morning and driving to work, you will see how they all add up.  Do you still think that 95% is a good rate?  This illustration shows that a 99.997% safety rate can still create a fatality. 

Just last year, the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster brought to light how quickly a mistake can turn into an environmental calamity, not to mention a workplace safety event.  How many oil platforms are there operating in the world's oceans.  How many different tankers are taking on crude from filling platforms and terminals?  Is 95% enough for your hometown or beachfront?  I don't think so.

We aren't in school, looking for the A+, we are working everyday to get the job done.  Do you want to be the one interviewed on TV about how your 5% led to a huge spill.  Are you looking to put your livelihood on the line for 95% quality in the goods you help produce?  Do you even know how it would feel to be at your co worker's funeral, looking their spouse in the eye, and telling them how sorry you were that a 5% chance took someone away for ever?

from  My office floor
I am going to keep this goofy broken wrench on my wall at work.  It is going to remind me of everything I need to do, not just for me, but for the coworker next to me, the person operating equipment built with our product, and the neighbors who we share the same earth with.  Sounds hokey?  Do the math.  Just like an old crusty engineering professor of mine use to always say "Garbage analysis yields garbage results, if you want to believe garbage, poke yourself in the eye with a sharp stick and you can convince yourself of any lie."


Popular posts from this blog

Business Culture Change Challenges: The Flat Earth Theory

The concept of a flat Earth dates back to the Bronze Age.  Early Greek philosophers including Pythagoras and later Aristotle were able to empirically develop the concept of a spherical Earth.  Ptolemy, hundreds of years later also used a spherical Earth model in the development of maps and the constructs of latitude and longitude.  How was it that such a developed science could be so easily dismissed in the dark ages?  For hundreds of years, the knowledge and understanding of a spherical earth was documented, yet for over 500 years you were labeled a heretic for even suggesting it.  The crews of Columbus’s initial New World Journey were terrified of the evils of over-speculated sea monsters and the inevitable fall off the edge of the world.  If you are encountering a culture shift in your workplace, then you have nothing to worry about compared what good ole’ Chris endured. Not only did Columbus need to get funding, he needed to recruit a crew of men to man the ships necessary

Richard Winters: Integrity In Leadership

Maj. Richard Winters      While I was watching HBO's " Band of Brothers " mini-series, for the twenty-something th time, I recognized something poignant. Maj. Richard Winters , who serves as the central connecting character, continually demonstrates exceptional middle management virtues.  His leadership is exemplary, not just in a military sense, but for any organizational setting.  He led by example and was always willing to go first, where he sent others.  He knew how to balance compassion with expectations. When it was necessary to be stern and authoritative, he was. When it was necessary to show empathy, he did.  He learned to delegate, even though it was never easy.  He gained the respect of his peers and his subordinates through his actions, not by intimidation or cruelty. Damien Lewis as Richard Winter s      Richard Winters knew he wasn't perfect. He didn't demand perfection, he demanded ultimate accountability. In contrast to Herbert Sobel's b

Movie Remakes. Where is the Imagination? Why was Papillon remade at all?

` It has been a while since I have posted, and for that I profusely apologize.  It's not that I haven't written, but I have ignored this blog too long. This particular post is a diversion from my normal managerial anecdotes, but I feel there is an important point regarding senseless remakes and reboots of films that were perfectly great to begin with. Please don't get me wrong; I think that advances in special effects and cinematography allow for a clearer representation of a director's vision.  However, I can think of only a few remakes that even come close to the original in quality, and perhaps "The Bounty" with Anthony Hopkins and a young Mel Gibson is one of them.  Unfortunately, remaking the 1973 "Papillon" that starred Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman is not one of them. Dustin Hoffman's Louis Dega McQueen as Charriere (Papillon) I remember watching the original with my brother over 40 years ago. Steve McQuee