Skip to main content

Self Centeredness - A Tale of Two Books

    One of my favorite books is Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger.  I read it on my own while in middle school, a second time by assignment in High School, and a third time while I was a student in college.  Mr. Salinger succinctly illustrates a timeless picture of teenage angst and a young man's realization of his self-centered behavior.  Some of the language or descriptions slightly date the book.  However, unlike so many classics read in High School, it allows an opportunity for any young man, and young women to take a look inside themselves to see even just a sliver of self-realization.

     One of the least favorite books (mainly because of the main character) is Rabbit Run by John Updike.  I read this book about two years ago. I was travelling back from Florida with my son Alek.  We were both listening to a program on NPR (on the day of the author's birthday) which included several past interviews with John Updike by Terry Gross.  During one of the interviews both Mr. Updike and Ms. Gross engaged in a deep character discussion of Harry Angstrom.  I was so impressed with the program, that I checked out the book from the library the day after I arrived home.  After reading the first 100 pages, I already knew that I hated Harry Angstrom, and that finishing the book was going to be a push.  It is very rare that I finish a book and didn't enjoy the experience.  John Updike did write the book well, one of his earlier novels, but the character was not a protagonist, instead he was a douchebag.

(Check out this link to the interview/program:

     I have always suggested to my kids that they muscle through the first 50 pages of a book before abandoning it.  Sometimes a book starts with a slow rhythm or frustrating character development that is discouraging to read.  I have found that audiobooks can be similarly frustrating, until you get used to the reader's method and quirks. The entire read was frustrating to me, not because of Updike's writing.  Rabbit is an poor excuse for a husband and a father, plain and simple.  Unlike Salinger's Holden Caulfield, Harry is an adult, a husband, and a new father.  Harry's brand of self-centered behavior is the kind that frustrates me the most with co-workers, superiors, and subordinates.  In fact, I find that I have little patience with self-centeredness all together.

     So why is this posted on Manager Sandwich?  Dunno, except that I feel there is a significant character comparison that allows us to understand the origin of this type of behavior, the damage it causes, and how epiphanies of self-realization can help people change.  Holden is a typical teenage boy at heart, but his selfishness has cost him relationships.  At the end of the book, and at the end of his New York City escapade, he sees himself, even for a glimpse, of how others see him.  Harry on the other hand is a child in a man's body.  Throughout the book, I nodded my head and muttered "A$$hole".  I even tried to read Rabbit Redux but after 50 pages, i summarily said "F*ck it!" and took it back to the library.  Maybe Harry gets it by the end of that book, or in the final book of the trilogy, but honestly, I had enough of him.  I work with plenty of Harry Angstroms, and didn't have the patience to waste my personal spare time reading about another one!

Holden on the other hand shows me the potential that disenfranchised or disillusioned people have to see through their situation and move forward in life.  Holden represents the possibilities that maturity can bring, while Harry personifies the selfishness that we must endure each and every day.  I am going to post this on facebook, and I hope that many people read it and respond with their take.

On a lighter note, a good friend of mine Rick once told me a funny story.  He was in an airport and had one of the attendants page for Holden Caulfield so he could see how many people looked up during the announcement.  Much to his chagrin, nobody that he could see responded at all.  I thought the story was a hoot, and I told him that he would have been able to notice me since I would be laughing out loud at the prank.  I am further suprised that I have never, ever met someone named Holden Caulfield.  I am sure that they are out there.


  1. While I understand where you're coming from, it's easy to get into trouble with making fiction into morality tales or fictional characters into role models. I read Rabbit, Run not long after it came out and was struck by the power of it, the picture of a hapless young couple, totally in over their heads. I still remember the horror of the wife - (was her name Janis?) - drowning the baby while drunk. The job of an author is to take a character and have things, often bad things, happen to that character. No flaws in the character, no bad things, no story. That's why I can't write fiction! I loved both Salinger and Updike and went through phases of reading everything they wrote. That wasn't so hard for Salinger, since he stopped writing after a certain point, or at least stopped publishing. Updike, on the other hand, had an amazing output throughout his long life. They both wrote fantastic short stories as well as novels. Their personal lives were not all that admirable at times and I think they both knew from first hand experience about self-centeredness. Regarding Salinger, you might want to read about his relationship with Joyce Maynard.

  2. Really a great most.And also informative too.Like this post.Thanks for sharing :)
    survive the end days book


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Business Culture Change Challenges: The Flat Earth Theory

The concept of a flat Earth dates back to the Bronze Age.  Early Greek philosophers including Pythagoras and later Aristotle were able to empirically develop the concept of a spherical Earth.  Ptolemy, hundreds of years later also used a spherical Earth model in the development of maps and the constructs of latitude and longitude.  How was it that such a developed science could be so easily dismissed in the dark ages?  For hundreds of years, the knowledge and understanding of a spherical earth was documented, yet for over 500 years you were labeled a heretic for even suggesting it.  The crews of Columbus’s initial New World Journey were terrified of the evils of over-speculated sea monsters and the inevitable fall off the edge of the world.  If you are encountering a culture shift in your workplace, then you have nothing to worry about compared what good ole’ Chris endured. Not only did Columbus need to get funding, he needed to recruit a crew of men to man the ships necessary

Richard Winters: Integrity In Leadership

Maj. Richard Winters      While I was watching HBO's " Band of Brothers " mini-series, for the twenty-something th time, I recognized something poignant. Maj. Richard Winters , who serves as the central connecting character, continually demonstrates exceptional middle management virtues.  His leadership is exemplary, not just in a military sense, but for any organizational setting.  He led by example and was always willing to go first, where he sent others.  He knew how to balance compassion with expectations. When it was necessary to be stern and authoritative, he was. When it was necessary to show empathy, he did.  He learned to delegate, even though it was never easy.  He gained the respect of his peers and his subordinates through his actions, not by intimidation or cruelty. Damien Lewis as Richard Winter s      Richard Winters knew he wasn't perfect. He didn't demand perfection, he demanded ultimate accountability. In contrast to Herbert Sobel's b

Movie Remakes. Where is the Imagination? Why was Papillon remade at all?

` It has been a while since I have posted, and for that I profusely apologize.  It's not that I haven't written, but I have ignored this blog too long. This particular post is a diversion from my normal managerial anecdotes, but I feel there is an important point regarding senseless remakes and reboots of films that were perfectly great to begin with. Please don't get me wrong; I think that advances in special effects and cinematography allow for a clearer representation of a director's vision.  However, I can think of only a few remakes that even come close to the original in quality, and perhaps "The Bounty" with Anthony Hopkins and a young Mel Gibson is one of them.  Unfortunately, remaking the 1973 "Papillon" that starred Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman is not one of them. Dustin Hoffman's Louis Dega McQueen as Charriere (Papillon) I remember watching the original with my brother over 40 years ago. Steve McQuee