Skip to main content

What does your name tag say about you?

Isn't it interesting when you attend a training session, and are required to write your name on a placard that sits on the table in front of you?  What does it really say about who you are.  Many times, when I have attended training sessions, whether inside or outside of my employer, I have wondered what that sign says about me to others.  One of the first things that go on in these sessions is for each person to say something about themselves through a scripted format of questions . . . .Who am I?  What department do I work in? Why am I here . . .It is all well and good, and does serve as an excellent ice breaker,  it also lets everyone know what to call you.

People always ask me whether they should call me David, or Dave, or even Bussell.  I really don't have a preference.  Co-workers usually call me Dave or Bussell, rarely David.  Because it is such a blur, I don't remember what anyone calls me on a regular basis, except for what my parents and my wife call me (David).

Several years ago, I attended a supervisory training session that was held for all of the supervisors in our division.  We were assigned to one of four sessions that included 14-16 supervisors from around the plant.  This particular session dealt with "Dealing with difficult personalities".  The content was taken from the book  Dealing With People You Can't Stand by Dr. Rick Brinkman and Dr. Rick Kirshner.  Without going into too much detail since the book is a great read, we discussed ten different personality types that cause their own flavor of trouble in the workplace.

These personality types are described on the spectrum of passivity and aggresion with extreme ends being the most acute, and the ones along the scale having their own passive/agressive nuances.  We all sat in a U-shaped table setup, so most of us could face the rest of the group.  Silly enough, we all had placards in front of us with our first names and departments written on them with a Sharpie.  Like normal steel mill maladapts, we joked around about how we already knew each other, but the placards were originally meant for the instructor to learn our names so we could be called upon directly to participate, not for us.  We covered these different types of personalities, starting with the most agressive (Tank/Bulldozer) and proceeding throught he spectrum. With each description, the instructor would explain the different behaviors, how they manifested, and how they negatively interacted with others.  These included:

1)  Bulldozer/Tank - Agressive, alpha, control-freak, cruel when stressed.
2)  Sniper/Ambusher - Agressive but hidden, taking cheap shots, sarcastic
3)  The Time Bomb - Mostly agreeable, silent until a breaking point is reached then BOOM.
4)  The Know it All - Self explanatory.
5)  The Think They Know it All - Idiot.
6)  The Yes Person - Overly agreeable, afraid to disappoint.
7)  The Maybe Person - Wishy washy, unable to commit.
8)  The Nothing Person - Passive, protective, keeps things to themselves.
9)  The No Person  - Passive, always naysaying new ideas.
10) The Whiner - Passive as it gets, the victim.

Throughout this explanation of these ten personalities, I found myself looking around the room and realizing that we were all exhibiting these terrible traits.  Furthermore, I could put a label on each person there that I knew.  What was worse, everyone else was doing the  same thing.  We all had these odd looks on our faces as our eyes darted back and forth, scanning the room, mouthing little smirks, realizing  that we were the reason that we were being taught these traits. The traits were our traits, not our superior's or our suborndiates, but the very obstacles that were in our way of being quality supervisors. During this time, I don't think anyone was paying attention to the instructor anymore, we were completely entranced with that fact that each on of us were one of these characitures.

Finally, I took my placard, folded it the other way, and wrote on the clean side.  I placed it in front of me and exclaimed "Fine, there you go, I might was well just name myself 'Ambusher'!"  After that, everyone one at the table simultaneously took back their placards, folded them over and wrote on the clean side their newly conceptualized title.  Around the table, instead of names and departments on the tables, there were name tags reading "Bulldozer", "Sniper", "Whiner", etc.  As honest as young children we identified ourselves for who we really were.  The instructor was flabbergasted, and didn't know what to say.  She in turn took out a new placard, on it wrote "Know It All".

And then, the healing began.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business Culture Change Challenges: The Flat Earth Theory

The concept of a flat Earth dates back to the Bronze Age.  Early Greek philosophers including Pythagoras and later Aristotle were able to empirically develop the concept of a spherical Earth.  Ptolemy, hundreds of years later also used a spherical Earth model in the development of maps and the constructs of latitude and longitude.  How was it that such a developed science could be so easily dismissed in the dark ages?  For hundreds of years, the knowledge and understanding of a spherical earth was documented, yet for over 500 years you were labeled a heretic for even suggesting it.  The crews of Columbus’s initial New World Journey were terrified of the evils of over-speculated sea monsters and the inevitable fall off the edge of the world.  If you are encountering a culture shift in your workplace, then you have nothing to worry about compared what good ole’ Chris endured. Not only did Columbus need to get funding, he needed to recruit a crew of men to man the ships necessary

Richard Winters: Integrity In Leadership

Maj. Richard Winters      While I was watching HBO's " Band of Brothers " mini-series, for the twenty-something th time, I recognized something poignant. Maj. Richard Winters , who serves as the central connecting character, continually demonstrates exceptional middle management virtues.  His leadership is exemplary, not just in a military sense, but for any organizational setting.  He led by example and was always willing to go first, where he sent others.  He knew how to balance compassion with expectations. When it was necessary to be stern and authoritative, he was. When it was necessary to show empathy, he did.  He learned to delegate, even though it was never easy.  He gained the respect of his peers and his subordinates through his actions, not by intimidation or cruelty. Damien Lewis as Richard Winter s      Richard Winters knew he wasn't perfect. He didn't demand perfection, he demanded ultimate accountability. In contrast to Herbert Sobel's b

Movie Remakes. Where is the Imagination? Why was Papillon remade at all?

` It has been a while since I have posted, and for that I profusely apologize.  It's not that I haven't written, but I have ignored this blog too long. This particular post is a diversion from my normal managerial anecdotes, but I feel there is an important point regarding senseless remakes and reboots of films that were perfectly great to begin with. Please don't get me wrong; I think that advances in special effects and cinematography allow for a clearer representation of a director's vision.  However, I can think of only a few remakes that even come close to the original in quality, and perhaps "The Bounty" with Anthony Hopkins and a young Mel Gibson is one of them.  Unfortunately, remaking the 1973 "Papillon" that starred Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman is not one of them. Dustin Hoffman's Louis Dega McQueen as Charriere (Papillon) I remember watching the original with my brother over 40 years ago. Steve McQuee