Skip to main content

We need to see through our coworker's eyes and solve the problem together.

A while back, I endured the results of miscommunication between myself and a coworker.  There was a serious accident at work.  Fortunatley, there wasn't anyone hurt, but quite a bit of equipment damage did result.  I received the call late in the evening, about an hour before I was going to sleep.  My coworker was a bit frantic with his description about what happened.  I tried several times to get detailed information, but he was unable to answer my questions clearly.  It could be that he hadn't seen the damage himself or that he had a tough time describing what had happened.  Either way, while driving into work, I called a few other people in the plant to gain a better understanding about the mess I was walking into.  I finally reached someone who knew what was going on, and thankfully received better details on what really happened.

During the last twenty years, I have received hundreds of calls from work about mechanical failures, accidents, explosions, inujries, etc.  Sometimes it is necessary to get into work ASAP, while most times the solution can be arrived at while on the phone.  Each time I get a call about work, I grab a piece of scratch paper and something to write with.  My primary goal is to draw out what I hear to help me visualize the situation.

This is where the game of charades plays into solving problems.  Instead of my co-worker playing the mute, he/she is the conduit through which I see what is happening through their eyes.  What they see is converted into a verbal description that I must convert again into a visual image.  Invariably, the reality will get distorted, but with skill on both sides of the phone, those errors can be reduced.  The best way to accomplish this is through a hands-on training program.

This type of training can be done with a small group between 10-12 people, preferably even numbers so participants can be paired up.  The first part of the training deals with the effective methods of describing physical attributes and concepts.  Some time is spent on jargon or terminology that is customarily found in the workplace.  Each pair will be given an opportunity, where one participant has a drawing to describe, and the other needs to sketch it out during a verbal interchange.  During these interchanges, the rest of the training class gets to watch the game in play, and at its conclusion get to see the differences between the placard that  participant A was describing, and the sketch that participant B drew as a result.  If properly set-up, there will be comical differences between the two images that will illustrate the needs for the common use of terms, spatial relations, and basic communication.

After several groups have had the opportunity to work the scenes, the results will get more and more accurate as the natural competetiveness encourages participants to try harder to do better than the previous group.  Powerpoint presentations aside, the one-on-one interaction practice will give everyone involved a real taste for how proper use of language, terminology, and listening skills can yield clarity in understanding what is happening when we can only see it through someone else's eyes.


Popular posts from this blog

Outlaw Management: My Anger and Disappointment With the Sons of Anarchy, Jax Teller, and Kurt Sutter

     I have always enjoyed quality drama in books, television, and movies.  It is so admirable the creative ways that authors use to conjure believable characters out of nothing but pure inspiration.  The use of the word “conjure” is pivotal in its importance with this article since fictional characters are created, not born and raised from birth.  All too often, people fall into the “Star Trek Character Trap” (I just made that up) where they over analyze the consistency and depth of fictional scripts.  Back in 1986, a memorable skit on SNL, starring Bill Shatner at a Star Trek convention poked fun at the fans for over-analyzing the show into minutia.  Shatner’s stabbing lines including “Get a Life!”, and “ . . .move out of your parent’s basement . .” coupled with the players’ characters reactions (Dana Carvey, Jon Lovitz, and Kevin Nealon) were priceless.  Forget all of the controversy and upset fans, the truth is that the show, like so many other iconic creations was 100% conjur

The Mentor of a Middle Manager - Joel Bussell

       I have been writing this article for almost a month; bits and pieces at a time.   I wanted to finish it before December 26 th, on what would have been my father’s 84 th birthday.   Joel Bussell was the most important mentor in my life.   I have had many people who have influenced me during my journey into middle management.   Supervisors, department managers, coworkers, and even direct supports have helped guide me through numerous challenges.   However, my father was the first and most significant mentor of my entire life.   An engineer, and later an attorney, he was not ever a C-suite executive or a world-renowned leader. To those he taught in his classes or hired and developed in his 40-year manufacturing career, and 15 years as an educator, he was an invaluable mentor.        As I look back on my life, I can visualize many of the times my father advised me.   It was his idea for me to spend my summer mornings as 14-year-old, selling donuts door to door in office building

Smart, Capable, and Competent People Get Fired Everyday

    Over six months ago I experienced something that I haven't been through since my very first job renting prom tuxedos; I was fired.  Don't get any gossipy ideas, I wasn't let go because of anything immoral, illegal, or unethical.  My employment was terminated for "not achieving the goals of my position".  This is a very nebulous statement, and one that is very common when you are in upper management or on the upper end of middle management.     There is a strata in middle management where as long as you are doing your job, and business conditions aren't disastrous, you are pretty secure in your position.  You will notice that your manager or boss doesn't enjoy the same flavor of stability.  In my 25 years in heavy industry, I have seen countless regime changes that have resulted in a purging of the upper management.  Are these managers incompetent? Not always.  Are they insolent and stubborn? Sometimes.  Most often, they don't have the trust of th